{"id":4579,"date":"2025-03-02T19:33:03","date_gmt":"2025-03-02T19:33:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jimmy.ekota.net\/?p=4579"},"modified":"2025-03-02T19:33:04","modified_gmt":"2025-03-02T19:33:04","slug":"aught","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/jimmy.ekota.net\/?p=4579","title":{"rendered":"Aught"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>We were having a conversation the other day and a guy said something like, well that\u2019s not the way we did it back in aught four. I hadn\u2019t heard \u201caught\u201d used as a number in a long time, but when I was growing up, it seemed like that\u2019s what everyone said. Take 703 for instance \u2014 today we usually say \u201cseven zero three.\u201d But when I was little, at least in Oklahoma, most people would say \u201cseven aught three.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>That\u2019s just the way people talked \u2014 they\u2019d say \u201cback in aught-four Bush was president\u2026.\u201d or something like that. According to the dictionary, using the term \u201caught\u201d could mean both \u201czero\u201d and \u201canything.\u201d<br>So aught is an old-fashioned word that was fairly commonly used in the past to mean zero. There are a number of\u00a0 reasons that the use of aught to mean zero has declined \u2014 or gone away entirely\u2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Aught could mean both nothing and anything \u2014 that led to confusion. If you said he has aught of sense, it could mean he has <em>some<\/em> sense or <em>no<\/em> sense \u2014 depending on interpretation.\u00a0 \u00a0<br>As mathematics and science advanced, zero became the universally accepted term \u2014 especially in education, business and technology.<br>Over time, English speakers naturally favored other words, like <em>nothing<\/em> or simply <em>zero<\/em>, which were clearer and more commonly used in everyday speech.<br>Aught was more common in older English dialects, especially in Britain, but it gradually faded from everyday American and even British English.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But even today, you still find some old codgers that use aught in certain phrases \u2014 like referring to the early 2000s as \u201cthe aughts.\u201d<br>\u2014 30 \u2014<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We were having a conversation the other day and a guy said something like, well that\u2019s not the way we did it back in aught four. I hadn\u2019t heard \u201caught\u201d used as a number in a long time, but when &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/jimmy.ekota.net\/?p=4579\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/jimmy.ekota.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4579"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/jimmy.ekota.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/jimmy.ekota.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/jimmy.ekota.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/jimmy.ekota.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4579"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/jimmy.ekota.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4579\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4580,"href":"http:\/\/jimmy.ekota.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4579\/revisions\/4580"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/jimmy.ekota.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4579"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/jimmy.ekota.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4579"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/jimmy.ekota.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4579"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}